Counterexamples to the Cubic Graph Domination Conjecture

Mathematics – Combinatorics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 pages

Scientific paper

Let v(G) and dom(G) denote the number of vertices and the domination number of a graph G, and let r (G) = dom(G)/v(G)$. Let [x] and ]x[ be the floor and the ceiling of a number x. In 1996 B. Reed conjectured that if G is a cubic graph, then dom(G) is at most ]v(G)/3[. In 2005 A. Kostochka and B. Stodolsky disproved this conjecture for cubic graphs of connectivity one and maintained that the conjecture may still be true for 2-connected cubic graphs. Their minimum counterexample C has 4 bridges, v(C) = 60, anddom (C) = 21. In this paper we disprove Reed's conjecture for 2-connected cubic graphs by providing a sequence (R(k): k > 2) of cubic graphs of connectivity two with r(R_k) = 1/3 + 1/60, where v(R(k+1)) > v(R(k)) > v(R(3)) = 60 for k > 3, and so dom(R(3)) = 21$ and dom(R(k)) - ]v(R(k))/3[ tends to infinity when k tends to infinity. We also provide a sequence of (L_s: s > 0) of cubic graphs of connectivity one with r(L(s)) > 1/3 + 1/60. The minimum counterexample L = L(1) in this sequence is `better' than C in the sense that L has 2 bridges while C has 4 bridges, v(L) = 54 < 60 = v(C), and r(L) = 1/3 + 1/54} > 1/3 + 1/60 = r(C). We also give a construction providing for every t in {0,1,2} infinitely many cubic cyclically 4-connected Hamiltonian graphs G(t) such that v(G(t)) = t mod 3, t in {0,2} implies dom(G(t)) = ]v(G(r))/3[, and t = 1 implies dom(G(t)) = [v(G(r))/3]. At last we suggest a stronger conjecture on domination in cubic 3-connected graphs.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Counterexamples to the Cubic Graph Domination Conjecture does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Counterexamples to the Cubic Graph Domination Conjecture, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Counterexamples to the Cubic Graph Domination Conjecture will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-169723

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.