Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1998-02-27
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
4 pages, Latex, 1 figure, accepted in AA
Scientific paper
We show that a 2D projection is representative of its corresponding 3D distribution at a confidence level of 90 % if it follows a King profile and if we consider the whole spatial distribution. The level is significantly lower and not decisive in the vicinity of the 2D cluster center. On another hand, if we verify the reciprocal statement of the Mattig's distribution (1958) -i.e. a flux limited sample is represented by a 0.6 slope of its count law-, we point out that, due to the usual unaccuracy of the slope determination, a slope of 0.6 is not a sufficiently strict criterion for completeness and uniformity of a sample as often used in the literature.
Adami Chris
Amram Ph.
Comte Georges
No associations
LandOfFree
Count laws and projection effects in clusters of galaxies does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Count laws and projection effects in clusters of galaxies, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Count laws and projection effects in clusters of galaxies will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-364115