Correlation between the Mayan calendar and ours: Astronomy helps to answer why the most popular correlation (GMT) is wrong

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Celestial Mechanics, Ephemerides, History And Philosophy Of Astronomy

Scientific paper

The Maya used their own very precise calendar. When transforming data from the Mayan calendar to ours, or vice versa, a surprisingly large uncertainty is found. The relationship between the two calendars has been investigated by many researchers during the last century and about 50 different values of the transformation coefficient, known as the correlation, have been deduced. They can differ by centuries, potentially yielding an incredibly large error in the relation of Mayan history to the history of other civilizations. The most frequently used correlation is the GMT one (of Goodman-Martínez-Thompson), based largely on historical evidence from colonial times. Astronomy (celestial mechanics) may resolve the problem of the correlation, provided that historians have correctly decoded the records of various astronomical phenomena discovered, namely, in one extremely important and rare Mayan book, the Dresden Codex (DC). This describes (among other matters) observations of various astronomical phenomena (eclipses, conjunctions, maximum elongations, heliacal aspects, etc), made by the Maya. Modern celestial mechanics enables us to compute exactly when the phenomena occurred in the sky for the given place on the Earth, even though far back in time. Here we check (by a completely independent method), confirming the value of the correlation obtained by Böhm & Böhm (1996, 1999). In view of these tests, we advocate rejecting the GMT correlation and replacing it by the Böhm's correlation. We also comment on the criticism of GMT by some investigators. The replacement of GMT by another correlation seems, however, unacceptable to many Mayanists, as they would need to rewrite the whole history of Mesoamerica. The history of the Maya would be - for example with Böhm's correlation - closer to our time by 104 years.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Correlation between the Mayan calendar and ours: Astronomy helps to answer why the most popular correlation (GMT) is wrong does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Correlation between the Mayan calendar and ours: Astronomy helps to answer why the most popular correlation (GMT) is wrong, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Correlation between the Mayan calendar and ours: Astronomy helps to answer why the most popular correlation (GMT) is wrong will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1406470

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.