Conventional N-, L-, and R-tests of earthquake forecasting models without simulated catalogs

Details Conventional N-, L-, and R-tests of earthquake forecasting models without simulated catalogs Conventional N-, L-, and R-tests of earthquake forecasting models without simulated catalogs

Mar 2011

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011ep%26s...63..275i&link_type=abstract

Earth, Planets and Space, Volume 63, Issue 3, p. 275-287.

Other

1

Scientific paper

We propose a new procedure for testing the expected number (N-test), log likelihood (L-test), and log likelihood-ratio (R-test) of seismicity models. In these tests, scores obtained from observed earthquakes are compared with distributions of scores estimated from earthquakes expected from the models under test. We introduce a method to estimate the test score distributions analytically where uncertainties in magnitude and hypocentral parameters are involved. The analytical formulas used to estimate expected values and standard deviations of the test scores for earthquakes conforming to the test models were derived in earlier published studies, which allowed calculation of normal approximations by which to test score distributions. Using these two methods simultaneously, we can perform N-, L-, and R-tests for seismicity models without using any simulated catalogs. As a case study, the proposed procedure was applied to two seismicity models for Kanto, central Japan. To compare our procedure with the current one based on the Monte Carlo method, we randomly generated sets of 10,000 earthquake catalogs of two kinds: one set conforming to the model under test, and the other derived from the observed catalog allowing for uncertainties in magnitude and hypocentral parameters. The distributions of L-scores obtained from both sets are in good agreement with those obtained by the proposed procedure. This comparison suggests that the analytical approach presented here could be useful for conducting the N-, L-, and R-tests in a conventional way.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Conventional N-, L-, and R-tests of earthquake forecasting models without simulated catalogs does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Conventional N-, L-, and R-tests of earthquake forecasting models without simulated catalogs, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Conventional N-, L-, and R-tests of earthquake forecasting models without simulated catalogs will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-863114