Controlling the degree of caution in statistical inference with the Bayesian and frequentist approaches as opposite extremes

Mathematics – Statistics Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

In statistical practice, whether a Bayesian or frequentist approach is used in inference depends not only on the availability of prior information but also on the attitude taken toward partial prior information, with frequentists tending to be more cautious than Bayesians. The proposed framework defines that attitude in terms of a specified amount of caution, thereby enabling data analysis at the level of caution desired and on the basis of any prior information. The caution parameter represents the attitude toward partial prior information in much the same way as a loss function represents the attitude toward risk. When there is very little prior information and nonzero caution, the resulting inferences correspond to those of the candidate confidence intervals and p-values that are most similar to the credible intervals and hypothesis probabilities of the specified Bayesian posterior. On the other hand, in the presence of a known physical distribution of the parameter, inferences are based only on the corresponding physical posterior. In those extremes of either negligible prior information or complete prior information, inferences do not depend on the degree of caution. Partial prior information between those two extremes leads to intermediate inferences that are more frequentistic to the extent that the caution is high and more Bayesian to the extent that the caution is low.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Controlling the degree of caution in statistical inference with the Bayesian and frequentist approaches as opposite extremes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Controlling the degree of caution in statistical inference with the Bayesian and frequentist approaches as opposite extremes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Controlling the degree of caution in statistical inference with the Bayesian and frequentist approaches as opposite extremes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-602691

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.