Computer Science – Computation and Language
Scientific paper
1997-12-09
Computer Science
Computation and Language
Scientific paper
I take issue with AI formalizations of context, primarily the formalization by McCarthy and Buvac, that regard context as an undefined primitive whose formalization can be the same in many different kinds of AI tasks. In particular, any theory of context in natural language must take the special nature of natural language into account and cannot regard context simply as an undefined primitive. I show that there is no such thing as a coherent theory of context simpliciter -- context pure and simple -- and that context in natural language is not the same kind of thing as context in KR. In natural language, context is constructed by the speaker and the interpreter, and both have considerable discretion in so doing. Therefore, a formalization based on pre-defined contexts and pre-defined `lifting axioms' cannot account for how context is used in real-world language.
No associations
LandOfFree
Context as a Spurious Concept does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Context as a Spurious Concept, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Context as a Spurious Concept will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-437271