Context as a Spurious Concept

Computer Science – Computation and Language

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

I take issue with AI formalizations of context, primarily the formalization by McCarthy and Buvac, that regard context as an undefined primitive whose formalization can be the same in many different kinds of AI tasks. In particular, any theory of context in natural language must take the special nature of natural language into account and cannot regard context simply as an undefined primitive. I show that there is no such thing as a coherent theory of context simpliciter -- context pure and simple -- and that context in natural language is not the same kind of thing as context in KR. In natural language, context is constructed by the speaker and the interpreter, and both have considerable discretion in so doing. Therefore, a formalization based on pre-defined contexts and pre-defined `lifting axioms' cannot account for how context is used in real-world language.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Context as a Spurious Concept does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Context as a Spurious Concept, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Context as a Spurious Concept will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-437271

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.