Consequences of arithmetic for set theory

Mathematics – Logic

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

In this paper, we consider certain cardinals in ZF (set theory without AC, the Axiom of Choice). In ZFC (set theory with AC), given any cardinals C and D, either C <= D or D <= C. However, in ZF this is no longer so. For a given infinite set A consider Seq(A), the set of all sequences of A without repetition. We compare |Seq(A)|, the cardinality of this set, to |P(A)|, the cardinality of the power set of A. What is provable about these two cardinals in ZF? The main result of this paper is that ZF |- for all A: |Seq(A)| not= |P(A)| and we show that this is the best possible result. Furthermore, it is provable in ZF that if B is an infinite set, then |fin(B)|<|P(B)|, even though the existence for some infinite set B^* of a function f from fin(B^*) onto P(B^*) is consistent with ZF.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Consequences of arithmetic for set theory does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Consequences of arithmetic for set theory, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Consequences of arithmetic for set theory will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-228690

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.