Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Scientific paper
2004-08-08
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
8 pages
Scientific paper
In the lowest nonlinear approximation I compare two gravitational wave equations,- those of Weinberg and Papapetrou. The first one is simply a form of Einstein equation and the second is claimed to be yet another field theoretical form in which the energy-momentum tensor is obtained by Belinfante or Rosenfeld method. I show that for interacting gravitational field these methods lead to different energy-momentum tensors. Both these tensors need to be complemented "by hand" with some interaction energy-momentum tensors in order that the conservation laws of the total energy-momentum tensor give equation of motion for particles in agreement with general relativity. In approximation considered by Thirring, the Papapetrou wave equation must coincide with that of Thirring. But they differ because Thirring inserted the necessary interaction term. I show that Thirring wave equation is equivalent to Weinberg's one. Hence the Papapetrou equation is not yet another form of Einstein equation.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparison of two field theoretical forms of gravitational wave equations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparison of two field theoretical forms of gravitational wave equations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of two field theoretical forms of gravitational wave equations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-311471