Comparison of three satellite models of the main geomagnetic field

Details Comparison of three satellite models of the main geomagnetic field Comparison of three satellite models of the main geomagnetic field

Apr 1985

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1985ge%26ae..25..343b&link_type=abstract

Geomagnetizm i Aeronomiia (ISSN 0016-7940), vol. 25, Mar.-Apr. 1985, p. 343-345. In Russian.

Computer Science

Earth Surface, Geomagnetism, Magnetic Surveys, Satellite-Borne Photography, Cosmos Satellites, Magsat Satellites, Ogo, Spherical Harmonics

Scientific paper

The Cosmos-49 model is compared with the OGO and Magsat 6/80 models. The results indicate that, in order to obtain sufficiently reliable spherical harmonic coefficients, it is necessary that the data cover the entire (or almost the entire) globe. The fact that observations were made at different heights (Cosmos and Magsat at 300-500 km, OGO at 400-1500 km) did not have a significant influence on the three models. Thus, if the task of the model is an approximation of the main field along, it is fully admissible to use data from high-flying satellites.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comparison of three satellite models of the main geomagnetic field does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparison of three satellite models of the main geomagnetic field, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of three satellite models of the main geomagnetic field will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1289051