Statistics
Scientific paper
Oct 1999
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1999spie.3753..300b&link_type=abstract
Proc. SPIE Vol. 3753, p. 300-307, Imaging Spectrometry V, Michael R. Descour; Sylvia S. Shen; Eds.
Statistics
Scientific paper
In recent years a number of techniques for automated classification of terrain from spectral data have been developed and applied to multispectral and hyperspectral data. Use of these techniques for hyperspectral data has presented a number of technical and practical challenges. Here we present a comparison of two fundamentally different approaches to spectral classification of data: (1) Stochastic Expectation Maximization (SEM), and (2) linear unmixing. The underlying background clutter models for each are discussed and parallels between them are explored. Parallels are drawn between estimated parameters or statistics obtained from each type of method. The mathematical parallels are then explored through application of these clutter models to airborne hyperspectral data from the NASA AVIRIS sensor. The results show surprising similarity between some of the estimates derived from these two clutter models, despite the major differences in the underlying assumptions of each.
Beaven Scott G.
Hoff Lawrence E.
Winter Edwin M.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparison of SEM and linear unmixing approaches for classification of spectral data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparison of SEM and linear unmixing approaches for classification of spectral data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of SEM and linear unmixing approaches for classification of spectral data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1544835