Comparison of objective functions for estimating linear-nonlinear models

Biology – Quantitative Biology – Neurons and Cognition

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

to appear in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21 (NIPS, 2007)

Scientific paper

This paper compares a family of methods for characterizing neural feature selectivity with natural stimuli in the framework of the linear-nonlinear model. In this model, the neural firing rate is a nonlinear function of a small number of relevant stimulus components. The relevant stimulus dimensions can be found by maximizing one of the family of objective functions, Renyi divergences of different orders. We show that maximizing one of them, Renyi divergence of order 2, is equivalent to least-square fitting of the linear-nonlinear model to neural data. Next, we derive reconstruction errors in relevant dimensions found by maximizing Renyi divergences of arbitrary order in the asymptotic limit of large spike numbers. We find that the smallest rrors are obtained with Renyi divergence of order 1, also known as Kullback-Leibler divergence. This corresponds to finding relevant dimensions by maximizing mutual information. We numerically test how these optimization schemes perform in the regime of low signal-to-noise ratio (small number of spikes and increasing neural noise) for model visual neurons. We find that optimization schemes based on either least square fitting or information maximization perform well even when number of spikes is small. Information maximization provides slightly, but significantly, better reconstructions than least square fitting. This makes the problem of finding relevant dimensions, together with the problem of lossy compression, one of examples where information-theoretic measures are no more data limited than those derived from least squares.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparison of objective functions for estimating linear-nonlinear models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparison of objective functions for estimating linear-nonlinear models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of objective functions for estimating linear-nonlinear models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-495699

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.