Comparison of GPS strain rate computing methods and their reliability

Computer Science – Performance

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Numerical Solutions, Instability Analysis, Satellite Geodesy, High Strain Deformation Zones

Scientific paper

Using modelled and simulated data for comparison of several methods to compute GPS strain rate fields in terms of their precision and robustness reveals that least-squares collocation is superior. Large scale (75°E-135°E and 20°N-50°N) analyses of 1° grid sampling data and decimated 50 per cent data by resampling (then erasing data in two 5°× 10° region) reveal that the Delaunay method has poor performance and that the other three methods show high accuracy. The correlation coefficients between theoretical results and calculated results obtained with different errors in input data show that the order in terms of robustness, from good to bad, is least-squares collocation, spherical harmonics, multisurface function and the Delaunay method. The influence of data sparseness on different methods shows that least-squares collocation is better than spherical harmonics and multisurface function when sample data are distributed from a 2° grid to a 1° grid. Analysis to medium scale (90°E-120°E, 25°N-40°N) in 1°-0.5° grid sampling data reveals that least-squares collocation is superior to other methods in terms of robustness and sensitivity to data sparseness, but their difference is slight. Strain rate results obtained for the Chinese mainland using GPS data from 1999 to 2004 show that the spherical harmonics method has edge effects and that its value and range increase concomitantly with increased sparseness. The multisurface function method shows non-steady-state characteristics; the errors of results increase concomitantly with increased sparseness. The least-squares collocation method shows steady characteristics. The errors of results show no significant increase even though 50 per cent of input data are decimated by resampling. The spherical harmonics and multisurface function methods are affected by the geometric distribution of input data, but the least-squares collocation method is not.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparison of GPS strain rate computing methods and their reliability does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparison of GPS strain rate computing methods and their reliability, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of GPS strain rate computing methods and their reliability will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-926572

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.