Mathematics – Representation Theory
Scientific paper
2011-11-30
Mathematics
Representation Theory
28 pages
Scientific paper
Let $F$ be any non archimedean locally compact field of residual characteristic $p$, let $G$ be any reductive connected $F$-group and let $K$ be any special parahoric subgroup of $G(F)$. We choose a parabolic $F$-subgroup $P$ of $G$ with Levi decomposition $P=MN$ in good position with respect to $K$. Let $C$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic $p$. We choose an irreducible smooth $C$-representation $V$ of $K$. We investigate the natural intertwiner from the compact induced representation $\ind_{K}^{G(F)}V$ to the parabolically induced representation $\Ind_{P(F)}^{G(F)}(\ind_{M(F) \cap K}^{M(F)}V_{N(F)\cap K})$. Under a regularity condition on $V$, we show that the intertwiner becomes an isomorphism after a localisation at a specific Hecke operator. When $F$ has characteristic 0, $G$ is $F$-split and $K$ is hyperspecial, the result was essentially proved by Herzig. We define the notion of $K$-supersingular irreducible smooth $C$-representation of $G(F)$ which extends Herzig's definition for admissible irreducible representations and we give a list of $K$-supersingular irreducible representations which are supercuspidal and conversely a list of supercuspidal representations which are $K$-supersingular.
Guy Henniart
Marie-France Vigneras
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparison of compact induction with parabolic induction does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparison of compact induction with parabolic induction, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of compact induction with parabolic induction will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-9404