Computer Science
Scientific paper
Dec 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009ge%26ae..49..940m&link_type=abstract
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, Volume 49, Issue 7, pp.940-946
Computer Science
Scientific paper
A comparative testing of two methods for reconstructing a nonlinear force-free field in a bounded spatial domain has mainly been studied based on the optimization method, using (1) fixed boundary values and weighting function and (2) purposefully varied boundary values. The quantitative and qualitative characteristics, reflecting the degree of correspondence between the calculated and known model fields, are presented. It is indicated that the second approach to the implementation of the optimization method gives the best approximation to the required solution, corresponding to the finite solution in an unbounded domain, and the quality of this solution remains unchanged up to the reconstruction domain boundaries.
Mysh'yakov I. I.
Rudenko George V.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparison between two approaches to the implementation of the optimization method for reconstructing a nonlinear force-free field does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparison between two approaches to the implementation of the optimization method for reconstructing a nonlinear force-free field, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison between two approaches to the implementation of the optimization method for reconstructing a nonlinear force-free field will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1887399