Computer Science
Scientific paper
Mar 2002
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2002esasp.477..285m&link_type=abstract
In: Proceedings of the Second Solar Cycle and Space Weather Euroconference, 24 - 29 September 2001, Vico Equense, Italy. Editor:
Computer Science
Interplanetary Shocks, Cmes
Scientific paper
The arrival times at L1 of eleven travelling shocks individually generated in association with X-ray flares accompanied by halo CMEs, high energy protons and Type II drift bursts, were each compared with the corresponding predicted values of shock arrival provided by three, widely used, numerical models [the Shock Time of Arrival Model (STOA): the Interplanetary Solar Propagation Model (ISPM) and the Hakamada-Akasofu-Fry Solar Wind Model (HAF-v2)]. These comparisons indicate that the three models tested provided satisfactory predictions (accuracy in the general range 1-5h).
Berdichevsky Daniel
Deehr Charles S.
Dryer Murray
Fry Craig D.
Kecskemety Károly
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparison between the measured arrival times at L1 of shocks generated in association with eleven flare/halo CME events and their predicted arrival times computed using three numerical models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparison between the measured arrival times at L1 of shocks generated in association with eleven flare/halo CME events and their predicted arrival times computed using three numerical models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison between the measured arrival times at L1 of shocks generated in association with eleven flare/halo CME events and their predicted arrival times computed using three numerical models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-780214