Comparison between the EUV performances of cryogenically cooled CCDs and a MAMA detector

Details Comparison between the EUV performances of cryogenically cooled CCDs and a MAMA detector Comparison between the EUV performances of cryogenically cooled CCDs and a MAMA detector

Oct 1992

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1992spie.1743..199n&link_type=abstract

In: EUV, X-ray, and gamma-ray instrumentation for astronomy III; Proceedings of the Meeting, San Diego, CA, July 22-24, 1992 (A9

Computer Science

Performance

2

Charge Coupled Devices, Cryogenic Cooling, Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation, Multi-Anode Microchannel Arrays, Performance Prediction, Calibrating, Cryogenic Equipment, Liquid Nitrogen

Scientific paper

Measurements have been conducted to characterize the performance of cryogenically cooled CCDs and a multianode microchannel array (MAMA) detector in the EUV region. The performance of the MAMA and cryocooled CCD detector types is compared with a view to the conditions under which one of the detectors is preferable to the other; this selection may be critical in a space-mission detector context. MAMA detector performance is generally far superior to that of the CCDs.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comparison between the EUV performances of cryogenically cooled CCDs and a MAMA detector does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparison between the EUV performances of cryogenically cooled CCDs and a MAMA detector, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison between the EUV performances of cryogenically cooled CCDs and a MAMA detector will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1871777