Computer Science
Scientific paper
Dec 1994
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1994adspr..14...83s&link_type=abstract
Advances in Space Research, Volume 14, Issue 12, p. 83-86.
Computer Science
1
Scientific paper
The Di Giovanni/Radicella model (DGR) /1/ determines a bottom side electron densty profile alone from the set of routinely scaled ionogram parameters foE, foF1, foF2 and M(3000)F2 and the total electron content; the smoothed sunspot number R12 appears in the calculation. Present designations are DGR2/2/ and DRR3 /3/ [see Appendix]; they are valid in the northern hemisphere. DGR is compared with electron density profiles derived from ionograms obtained at Juliusruh (54.6°N, 13.4°E), and with the (URSI-based) IRI90 at different conditiones. Experimental total electron content (TEC) data are compared to both models. At the considered station, the profiles obtained by both models are reasonably in agreement amongst themselves and with the experimental data.
The TEC derived from the DGR3 model is in good agreement with experimental TEC, whereas, at high solar activity, IRI90 gives too high TEC values, especially during daytime.
Bremer Jürgen
Singer Wolfgang
Weiss Jerome
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparing the improved Di Giovanni/Radicella model with sounding-based electron density profiles and with the IRI model does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparing the improved Di Giovanni/Radicella model with sounding-based electron density profiles and with the IRI model, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparing the improved Di Giovanni/Radicella model with sounding-based electron density profiles and with the IRI model will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1324960