Comparing Relativistic Electron Prediction Models at Geosynchronous

Computer Science – Performance

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

2720 Energetic Particles: Trapped, 2722 Forecasting (7924, 7964), 2774 Radiation Belts, 7924 Forecasting (2722), 7959 Models

Scientific paper

Extended periods of relativistic electron intensity at geosynchronous orbit can create severe deep-charging hazards for satellites. Several models have been developed over the last fifteen years to predict electron flux levels using solar wind and geomagnetic indexes as inputs. We analyze four of these models, USAF and NOAA/Space Environment Center after Baker et al. [1990], Koons and Gorney [1991], Li [2004], and Rigler et al. [2004], as a function of the solar cycle to determine which ones give the best 1, 2 and 3 day forecasts. The predictions of each model are compared to the standard GOES > 2 MeV electron flux and the performance measured by calculating skill scores in which the subject forecast is compared to a persistence reference forecast. Preliminary results will be presented.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparing Relativistic Electron Prediction Models at Geosynchronous does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparing Relativistic Electron Prediction Models at Geosynchronous, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparing Relativistic Electron Prediction Models at Geosynchronous will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1028884

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.