Comparing a Linguistic and a Stochastic Tagger

Details Comparing a Linguistic and a Stochastic Tagger Comparing a Linguistic and a Stochastic Tagger

1997-06-07

arxiv.org/abs/cmp-lg/9706005v1

Computer Science

Computation and Language

8 pages, LaTeX, 2 postscript figures. E-ACL'97

Scientific paper

Concerning different approaches to automatic PoS tagging: EngCG-2, a constraint-based morphological tagger, is compared in a double-blind test with a state-of-the-art statistical tagger on a common disambiguation task using a common tag set. The experiments show that for the same amount of remaining ambiguity, the error rate of the statistical tagger is one order of magnitude greater than that of the rule-based one. The two related issues of priming effects compromising the results and disagreement between human annotators are also addressed.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comparing a Linguistic and a Stochastic Tagger does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparing a Linguistic and a Stochastic Tagger, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparing a Linguistic and a Stochastic Tagger will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-298969