Comparative study of DCT and wavelet-based coding

Details Comparative study of DCT and wavelet-based coding Comparative study of DCT and wavelet-based coding

Oct 1997

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1997spie.3164..271x&link_type=abstract

Proc. SPIE Vol. 3164, p. 271-278, Applications of Digital Image Processing XX, Andrew G. Tescher; Ed.

Statistics

Applications

Scientific paper

We study the performance difference of the discrete cosine transform (DCT) and the wavelet transform for both image and video coding, while comparing the other aspects of the coding system on an equal footing. Based on the state-of-the-art coding techniques, we point out that, for still images, the performance gap between DCT and wavelet based coding is within one dB in PSNR at the same bitrate. This is in contrast to the common perception that the wavelet transform is much superior to the DCT for image compression. For video coding, the advantage of using the wavelet transform over the DCT is even less pronounced.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comparative study of DCT and wavelet-based coding does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparative study of DCT and wavelet-based coding, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparative study of DCT and wavelet-based coding will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1158868