Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Scientific paper
2000-03-14
Phys.Rev. D62 (2000) 024025; Erratum-ibid. D62 (2000) 109901
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
23 pages, 15 figures, corrected version
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevD.62.024025
Predictions of the standard thin lens approximation and a new iterative approach to gravitational lensing are compared with an ``exact'' approach in simple test cases involving one or two lenses. We show that the thin lens and iterative approaches are remarkably accurate in predicting time delays, source positions and image magnifications for a single monopole lens and combinations of two monopole lenses. In the cases studied, the iterative method provided greater accuracy than the thin lens method. We also study the accuracy of a ``2 lens, single lens plane model,'' where two monopole lenses colinear with the observer are modeled by a mass distribution in a single lens plane lying between them. We see that this model can lead to large inaccuracies in physically meaningful situations. A previous version of this paper was published as Phys.Rev.D62, 024025, (2000) with errors in the computation of two lens comparisons. This paper corrects these errors and presents new conclusions which differ from the previous version.
Kling Thomas P.
Newman Ezra Ted
Perez Alejandro
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparative Studies of Lensing Methods does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparative Studies of Lensing Methods, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparative Studies of Lensing Methods will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-459750