Comparative and qualitative robustness for law-invariant risk measures

Economy – Quantitative Finance – Risk Management

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

When estimating the risk of a P&L from historical data or Monte Carlo simulation, the robustness of the estimate is important. We argue here that Hampel's classical notion of qualitative robustness is not suitable for risk measurement and we propose and analyze a refined notion of robustness that applies to tail-dependent law-invariant convex risk measures on Orlicz space. This concept of robustness captures the tradeoff between robustness and sensitivity and can be quantified by an index of qualitative robustness. By means of this index, we can compare various risk measures, such as distortion risk measures, in regard to their degree of robustness. Our analysis also yields results that are of independent interest such as continuity properties and consistency of estimators for risk measures, or a Skorohod representation theorem for {\psi}-weak convergence.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparative and qualitative robustness for law-invariant risk measures does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparative and qualitative robustness for law-invariant risk measures, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparative and qualitative robustness for law-invariant risk measures will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-717110

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.