Comparative Analysis of Existing Methods and Algorithms for Automatic Assignment of Reviewers to Papers

Computer Science – Digital Libraries

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

The article focuses on the importance of the automatic assignment of reviewers to papers for increasing the assignment accuracy therefore the quality of the scientific event itself. It discusses the main aspects that influence the assignment accuracy, performs a detailed analysis of the methods of describing papers and reviewers' competences used by the existing conference management systems and suggests some improvements in the way the similarity factors are calculated.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparative Analysis of Existing Methods and Algorithms for Automatic Assignment of Reviewers to Papers does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparative Analysis of Existing Methods and Algorithms for Automatic Assignment of Reviewers to Papers, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparative Analysis of Existing Methods and Algorithms for Automatic Assignment of Reviewers to Papers will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-77204

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.