Other
Scientific paper
Oct 2008
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2008ge%26ae..48..595l&link_type=abstract
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp.595-605
Other
1
94.30.Lr
Scientific paper
Pseudobreakup and substorm breakup are compared in two cases when these events followed each other at an interval of about an hour. Both ground-based measurements and data of satellite detectors of charged particles have been used. It has been indicated that pseudobreakups are characterized by a weak intensity of auroral activation and the field-aligned flux of low-energy electrons that caused this activation. In addition, the flux of energetic ions accelerated during pseudobreakup, and the energy of these ions are low as compared to these parameters at a substorm onset. Therefore, the above parameters are ineffective in creation of conditions for development of the following activation. At the same time, the flux of energetic electrons and the ionization degree are high, which results in a considerable release of energy stored in this sector.
Kozelova T. V.
Lazutin Leonid Leonidovich
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparative analysis of developed substorm breakup and pseudobreakup does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparative analysis of developed substorm breakup and pseudobreakup, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparative analysis of developed substorm breakup and pseudobreakup will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1700006