Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Scientific paper
2007-10-03
Class.Quant.Grav.25:035013,2008
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
18 pages, revised to match published version
Scientific paper
10.1088/0264-9381/25/3/035013
In this paper we address important issues surrounding the choice of variables when performing a dynamical systems analysis of alternative theories of gravity. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of compactifying the state space, and illustrate this using two examples. We first show how to define a compact state space for the class of LRS Bianchi type I models in $R^n$-gravity and compare to a non--compact expansion--normalised approach. In the second example we consider the flat Friedmann matter subspace of the previous example, and compare the compact analysis to studies where non-compact non--expansion--normalised variables were used. In both examples we comment on the existence of bouncing or recollapsing orbits as well as the existence of static models.
Dunsby Peter K. S.
Goheer Naureen
Leach Jannie A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Compactifying the state space for alternative theories of gravity does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Compactifying the state space for alternative theories of gravity, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Compactifying the state space for alternative theories of gravity will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-285974