Common Radial Velocity vs. Rare Microlensing: Difficulties and Futures

Details Common Radial Velocity vs. Rare Microlensing: Difficulties and Futures Common Radial Velocity vs. Rare Microlensing: Difficulties and Futures

2010-02-21

arxiv.org/abs/1002.4025v1

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

21 figures, 3 tables; Prepublished version

Scientific paper

In this paper, effective factors for success of Microlensing and Radial Velocity methods were choose. A semi-Delphi process applied on the factors to evaluating them and finding the most important factors for present situation of ML and RV, with help from about 100 experts, in or related exoplanets detection. I found the public definition on "success of exoplanets detection methods" is not correct and we should change it, as some experts did it, in the form of fundamental questions in planetary science. Also, the views of "Special Experts" are different from other experts that help us to choose the right way in evaluating. The next step was choosing the best strategy for future and finally, from SWOT landscape and with a new objective of ML method (New Game Board Strategy) I suggested four critical future strategies for completing current strategic directions.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Common Radial Velocity vs. Rare Microlensing: Difficulties and Futures does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Common Radial Velocity vs. Rare Microlensing: Difficulties and Futures, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Common Radial Velocity vs. Rare Microlensing: Difficulties and Futures will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-372830