Comment on "On physical interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson effect"

Details Comment on "On physical interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson effect" Comment on "On physical interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson effect"

2000-07-10

arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0007122v2

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

Typographical error in a reference corrected

Scientific paper

In response to the comments of astro-ph/0006426 on Srikanth (Icarus 1999), we
clarify, and thereby justify, the definition of Poynting-Robertson drag adopted
in the latter. We confirm that dust absorption is a necessary condition while
re-emission is neither necessary nor sufficient for the inspiralling of a
rest-isotropically emitting dust.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comment on "On physical interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson effect" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "On physical interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson effect", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "On physical interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson effect" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-376623