Comment on 'Nonexistence of two forms of turbulent bremsstrahlung' by J. Kuijpers and D. B. Melrose

Details Comment on 'Nonexistence of two forms of turbulent bremsstrahlung' by J. Kuijpers and D. B. Melrose Comment on 'Nonexistence of two forms of turbulent bremsstrahlung' by J. Kuijpers and D. B. Melrose

Apr 1986

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1986apj...303..347n&link_type=abstract

Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 303, April 1, 1986, p. 347, 348.

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

3

Bremsstrahlung, Plasma Turbulence, Electrostatic Waves, Masers, Permittivity

Scientific paper

Kuijpers and Melrose make an error in imposing the symmetry
-k⇔k2. The "response" and "Lagrangian" formalisms with
the correct second symmetry -k⇔k2 agree. The most
dominant plasma maser effect comes from the polarization term, except
for the electrostatic waves not having an applied static magnetic field.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comment on 'Nonexistence of two forms of turbulent bremsstrahlung' by J. Kuijpers and D. B. Melrose does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on 'Nonexistence of two forms of turbulent bremsstrahlung' by J. Kuijpers and D. B. Melrose, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on 'Nonexistence of two forms of turbulent bremsstrahlung' by J. Kuijpers and D. B. Melrose will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1101816