Combining Kepler and HARPS Exoplanet Occurrence Rates to Infer the Period-Mass-Radius Distribution of Super-Earths/Sub-Neptunes

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

[5499] Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets / General Or Miscellaneous, [5799] Planetary Sciences: Fluid Planets / General Or Miscellaneous, [7599] Solar Physics, Astrophysics, And Astronomy / General Or Miscellaneous

Scientific paper

The ongoing High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Search (HARPS) has found that 30-50% of FGK stars in the solar neighborhood host planets with Mpl < MNep in orbits of P < 50 days. At first glance, this high overall occurrence rate seems at best to be marginally consistent with the planet frequency measured during Q0-Q2 of the Kepler Mission, whose 1235 detected planetary candidates imply that ˜ 15% of main sequence dwarfs harbor a short-period planet with Rpl < 4 R⊕ . A rigorous comparison between the two surveys is difficult, however, as they observe different stellar populations, measure different planetary physical properties, and are subject to radically different sampling plans. In this article, we report the results of a Monte Carlo study which seeks to partially overcome this apparent discrepancy by identifying plausible planetary population distributions which can jointly conform to the results of the two surveys. We find that a population concurrently consisting of (1) dense silicate-iron planets and (2) low-density volatile and gas-dominated worlds provides a natural fit to the current data. In this scenario, the fraction of dense planets decreases with increasing mass, from frocky = 90% at M = 1 M⊕ to frocky = 10% at M = MNep. Our best fit population has a total occurrence rate of 40% for 2 ≤ P ≤ 50 days and 1 ≤ M ≤ 17 M⊕ , and is characterized by simple power-law indices of the form N(M)dM ∝ Mα dM and N(P)dP ∝ Pβ dP with α = -1.0 and β = 0.0. Our model population therefore contains four free parameters and is readily testable with future observations. Furthermore, our model's insistence that at least two distinct types of planets must exist in the survey data indicates that multiple formation mechanisms are at work to produce the population of planets commonly referred to as ``super-Earths".

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Combining Kepler and HARPS Exoplanet Occurrence Rates to Infer the Period-Mass-Radius Distribution of Super-Earths/Sub-Neptunes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Combining Kepler and HARPS Exoplanet Occurrence Rates to Infer the Period-Mass-Radius Distribution of Super-Earths/Sub-Neptunes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Combining Kepler and HARPS Exoplanet Occurrence Rates to Infer the Period-Mass-Radius Distribution of Super-Earths/Sub-Neptunes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-870087

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.