Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Jan 2003
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2003a%26a...397..539s&link_type=abstract
Astronomy and Astrophysics, v.397, p.539-544 (2003)
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
4
Quasars: General, Gravitational Lensing
Scientific paper
Burbidge et al. (\cite {burbidge}) argue that the observed number of quasar pairs with small angular separations and different redshifts (typically Delta theta <= 5 arcsec and Delta z > 0.1 ) is not compatible with a random distribution of quasars over the sky. After a brief review of all known quasar pairs with different redshifts, we show by means of very simple calculations that the probability of finding the three accepted pairs accidentally is of the order of 10%. We conclude that, under realistic hypotheses, the observed number of quasar pairs with different redshifts is not unlikely. We also present arguments showing that gravitational lensing biases are probably not strong enough to significantly increase the expected number of quasar pairs. The failure to detect with HST a secondary lensed image of the background quasar near the foreground one in these three pairs supports this view.
Claeskens Jean-Francois
de Rop Yves
Hawkins R. S. M.
Iovino Angela
Lee Dong Won
No associations
LandOfFree
Close pairs of quasars with different redshifts: New observations and results does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Close pairs of quasars with different redshifts: New observations and results, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Close pairs of quasars with different redshifts: New observations and results will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1524256