Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Dec 2007
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007aas...211.5801j&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #211, #58.01; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 39, p.833
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
Scientific paper
The dark matter paradigm and cold dark matter (CDM) cosmology are widely accepted theories on which much of our understanding of the properties and evolution of the Universe is based. Yet these paradigms face a number of serious problems (e.g., the substructure crisis). A heuristic alternative to dark matter is the theory of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) and its relativistic formulation. For more than 20 years, MOND has successfully defied all attempts to disprove it. A few years ago we showed that for distant outer halo globular clusters, the expected line-of-sight velocity dispersions in the case of MOND exceed those expected in the case of Newtonian gravity by up to a factor of three (Baumgardt, Grebel, & Kroupa 2005). Such a large difference should be observationally measurable, and determining these dispersions provides a stringent test for MOND. We hence observed the outer halo globular cluster Palomar 14 with the Very Large Telescope at the European Southern Observatory in order to measure its line-of-sight velocity dispersion. We find a very low velocity dispersion, consistent with the Newtonian value and significantly below the prediction of MOND. This would seem to be a conclusive verdict against MOND; however, MOND might still be able to account for this low dispersion if the stellar mass function of Palomar 14 is significantly depleted in low-mass stars. We are thus also measuring the cluster's luminosity function to obtain a lower limit on its mass and to decide on the validity of MOND.
Baumgardt Holger
Grebel Eva Katharina
Hilker Michael
Jordi Katrin
Kroupa Pavel
No associations
LandOfFree
Classical or Modified Newtonian Dynamics? Testing MOND in Palomar 14 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Classical or Modified Newtonian Dynamics? Testing MOND in Palomar 14, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Classical or Modified Newtonian Dynamics? Testing MOND in Palomar 14 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1477968