Classical and Intuitionistic Subexponential Logics are Equally Expressive

Computer Science – Logic in Computer Science

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

15 pages, to appear in 19th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2010)

Scientific paper

It is standard to regard the intuitionistic restriction of a classical logic as increasing the expressivity of the logic because the classical logic can be adequately represented in the intuitionistic logic by double-negation, while the other direction has no truth-preserving propositional encodings. We show here that subexponential logic, which is a family of substructural refinements of classical logic, each parametric over a preorder over the subexponential connectives, does not suffer from this asymmetry if the preorder is systematically modified as part of the encoding. Precisely, we show a bijection between synthetic (i.e., focused) partial sequent derivations modulo a given encoding. Particular instances of our encoding for particular subexponential preorders give rise to both known and novel adequacy theorems for substructural logics.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Classical and Intuitionistic Subexponential Logics are Equally Expressive does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Classical and Intuitionistic Subexponential Logics are Equally Expressive, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Classical and Intuitionistic Subexponential Logics are Equally Expressive will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-100059

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.