Citation Statistics

Statistics – Methodology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

This paper commented in: [arXiv:0910.3532], [arXiv:0910.3537], [arXiv:0910.3543], [arXiv:0910.3546]. Rejoinder in [arXiv:0910.

Scientific paper

10.1214/09-STS285

This is a report about the use and misuse of citation data in the assessment of scientific research. The idea that research assessment must be done using ``simple and objective'' methods is increasingly prevalent today. The ``simple and objective'' methods are broadly interpreted as bibliometrics, that is, citation data and the statistics derived from them. There is a belief that citation statistics are inherently more accurate because they substitute simple numbers for complex judgments, and hence overcome the possible subjectivity of peer review. But this belief is unfounded.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Citation Statistics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Citation Statistics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Citation Statistics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-716174

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.