Statistics – Methodology
Scientific paper
2009-10-19
Statistical Science 2009, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1-14
Statistics
Methodology
This paper commented in: [arXiv:0910.3532], [arXiv:0910.3537], [arXiv:0910.3543], [arXiv:0910.3546]. Rejoinder in [arXiv:0910.
Scientific paper
10.1214/09-STS285
This is a report about the use and misuse of citation data in the assessment of scientific research. The idea that research assessment must be done using ``simple and objective'' methods is increasingly prevalent today. The ``simple and objective'' methods are broadly interpreted as bibliometrics, that is, citation data and the statistics derived from them. There is a belief that citation statistics are inherently more accurate because they substitute simple numbers for complex judgments, and hence overcome the possible subjectivity of peer review. But this belief is unfounded.
Adler Robert
Ewing John
Taylor Peter
No associations
LandOfFree
Citation Statistics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Citation Statistics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Citation Statistics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-716174