Caveal Lector: Comments on Douglas J. Keenan, 'Astro-Historiographic Chronologies of Early China are Unfounded'

Details Caveal Lector: Comments on Douglas J. Keenan, 'Astro-Historiographic Chronologies of Early China are Unfounded' Caveal Lector: Comments on Douglas J. Keenan, 'Astro-Historiographic Chronologies of Early China are Unfounded'

Jul 2007

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007jahh...10..137p&link_type=abstract

Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (ISSN 1440-2807), Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 137 - 141 (2007).

Mathematics

Logic

Ancient Chinese Chronology, Planetary Conjunctions, Astronomical Dating, Ancient Chinese History

Scientific paper

The author offers a point-by-point rebuttal of Douglas J. Keenan's
criticism of the use of astronomical records in dating the earliest
Chinese dynasties in the 2nd millennium BCE. Detailed references are
provided to the abundant historiographical and archaeological evidence
bearing on the early chronology which Keenan ignored in his critique.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Caveal Lector: Comments on Douglas J. Keenan, 'Astro-Historiographic Chronologies of Early China are Unfounded' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Caveal Lector: Comments on Douglas J. Keenan, 'Astro-Historiographic Chronologies of Early China are Unfounded', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Caveal Lector: Comments on Douglas J. Keenan, 'Astro-Historiographic Chronologies of Early China are Unfounded' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-781678