Can we avoid 'SIN' in the house of 'No Common Mechanism'?

Details Can we avoid 'SIN' in the house of 'No Common Mechanism'? Can we avoid 'SIN' in the house of 'No Common Mechanism'?

2009-11-30

arxiv.org/abs/0912.0041v1

Biology

Quantitative Biology

Populations and Evolution

33 pages, 1 figure

Scientific paper

In 'no common mechanism' (NCM) models of character evolution, each character can evolve on a phylogenetic tree under a partially or totally separate process (e.g. with its own branch lengths). In such cases, the usual conditions that suffice to establish the statistical consistency of tree reconstruction by methods such as maximum likelihood (ML) break down, suggesting that such methods may be prone to statistical inconsistency (SIN). In this paper we ask whether we can avoid SIN for tree topology reconstruction when adopting such models, either by using ML or any other method that could be devised. We prove that it is possible to avoid SIN for certain NCM models, but not for others, and the results depend delicately on the tree reconstruction method employed. We also describe the biological relevance of some recent mathematical results for the more usual 'common mechanism' setting. Our results are not intended to justify NCM, rather to set in place a framework within which such questions can be formally addressed.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Can we avoid 'SIN' in the house of 'No Common Mechanism'? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Can we avoid 'SIN' in the house of 'No Common Mechanism'?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Can we avoid 'SIN' in the house of 'No Common Mechanism'? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-444490