Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2003-06-22
Astron.Astrophys.408:17-26,2003
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
9 pages, 7 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
Scientific paper
10.1051/0004-6361:20030895
Although controversial, the scenario of microlensing as the dominant mechanism for the long-term optical variability of quasars does provide a natural explanation for both the statistical symmetry, achromaticity and lack of cosmological time dilation in quasar light curves. Here, we investigate to what extent dark matter populations of compact objects allowed in the currently favored Omega_M=0.3, Omega_Lambda=0.7 cosmology really can explain the quantitative statistical features of the observed variability. We find that microlensing reasonably well reproduces the average structure function of quasars, but fails to explain both the high fraction of objects with amplitudes higher than 0.35 magnitudes and the mean amplitudes observed at redshifts below one. Even though microlensing may still contribute to the long-term optical variability at some level, another significant mechanism must also be involved. This severely complicates the task of using light-curve statistics from quasars which are not multiply imaged to isolate properties of any cosmologically significant population of compact objects which may in fact be present.
Bergvall Nils
Helbig Phillip
Marquart Thomas
Zackrisson Erik
No associations
LandOfFree
Can Microlensing Explain the Long-Term Optical Variability of Quasars? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Can Microlensing Explain the Long-Term Optical Variability of Quasars?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Can Microlensing Explain the Long-Term Optical Variability of Quasars? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-154237