Bridging the Gap between Crisis Response Operations and Systems

Details Bridging the Gap between Crisis Response Operations and Systems Bridging the Gap between Crisis Response Operations and Systems

2009-08-28

arxiv.org/abs/0908.4290v1

Computer Science

Computers and Society

6 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables, accepted at The 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Digital Communication

Scientific paper

There exist huge problems in the current practice of crisis response operations. Response problems are projected as a combination of failure in communication, failure in technology, failure in methodology, failure of management, and finally failure of observation. In this paper we compare eight crisis response systems namely: DrillSim [2, 13], DEFACTO [12, 17], ALADDIN [1, 6], RoboCup Rescue [11, 15], FireGrid [3, 8, 18], WIPER [16], D-AESOP [4], and PLAN C [14]. Comparison results will disclose the cause of failure of current crisis response operations (the response gap). Based on comparison results; we provide recommendations for bridging this gap between response operations and systems.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Bridging the Gap between Crisis Response Operations and Systems does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Bridging the Gap between Crisis Response Operations and Systems, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Bridging the Gap between Crisis Response Operations and Systems will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-597274