"Black Star" or Astrophysical Black Hole?

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Poster presented at "Compact Objects" meeting in Hunagshan, China, 2-7 July 2007. To be published in the AIP Conference Procee

Scientific paper

10.1063/1.2840449

Recently wide publicity has been given to a claim by T. Vachaspati that "black holes do not exist", that the objects known as black holes in astrophysics should rather be called "black stars" and they not only do not have event horizons but actually can be the source of spectacular gamma ray bursts. In this short essay (no flimsier than the original preprint where these extravagant claims appeared) I demonstrate that these ill-considered claims are clearly wrong. Yet they present a good occasion to reflect on some well known but little discussed conceptual difficulties which arise when applying relativistic terminology in an astrophysical context.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

"Black Star" or Astrophysical Black Hole? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with "Black Star" or Astrophysical Black Hole?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and "Black Star" or Astrophysical Black Hole? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-562464

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.