Mathematics – Differential Geometry
Scientific paper
2003-04-18
Proceedings of the ICM, Beijing 2002, vol. 2, 257--272
Mathematics
Differential Geometry
Scientific paper
In a paper \cite{P} in 1973, R. Penrose made a physical argument that the total mass of a spacetime which contains black holes with event horizons of total area $A$ should be at least $\sqrt{A/16\pi}$. An important special case of this physical statement translates into a very beautiful mathematical inequality in Riemannian geometry known as the Riemannian Penrose inequality. One particularly geometric aspect of this problem is the fact that apparent horizons of black holes in this setting correspond to minimal surfaces in Riemannian 3-manifolds. The Riemannian Penrose inequality was first proved by G. Huisken and T. Ilmanen in 1997 for a single black hole \cite{HI} and then by the author in 1999 for any number of black holes \cite{Bray}. The two approaches use two different geometric flow techniques. The most general version of the Penrose inequality is still open. In this talk we will sketch the author's proof by flowing Riemannian manifolds inside the class of asymptotically flat 3-manifolds (asymptotic to $\real^3$ at infinity) which have nonnegative scalar curvature and contain minimal spheres. This new flow of metrics has very special properties and simulates an initial physical situation in which all of the matter falls into the black holes which merge into a single, spherically symmetric black hole given by the Schwarzschild metric. Since the Schwarzschild metric gives equality in the Penrose inequality and the flow decreases the total mass while preserving the area of the horizons of the black holes, the Penrose inequality follows. We will also discuss how these techniques can be generalized in higher dimensions.
No associations
LandOfFree
Black holes and the Penrose inequality in general relativity does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Black holes and the Penrose inequality in general relativity, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Black holes and the Penrose inequality in general relativity will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-596192