Biases in the Quasar Mass-Luminosity Plane

Details Biases in the Quasar Mass-Luminosity Plane Biases in the Quasar Mass-Luminosity Plane

2010-11-04

arxiv.org/abs/1011.1268v2

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

11 pages, 10 figures, Accepted for publication in MNRAS

Scientific paper

We find that the recently reported departure from the Eddington luminosity limit for the highest quasar black hole masses at a given redshift is an artifact due to biases in black hole mass measurements. This sub-Eddington boundary (with non-unity slope) in the quasar mass-luminosity plane was initially reported by Steinhardt & Elvis (2010a) using the FWHM-based black hole mass catalogue of Shen et al. (2008). However, the significance of the boundary is reduced when the FWHM-based mass-scaling relationship is recalibrated following Wang et al. (2009) and using the most updated reverberation mapping estimates of black hole masses. Furthermore, this boundary is not seen using mass estimates based on the line dispersion of the same quasars' MgII emission lines. Thus, the initial report of a sub-Eddington boundary with non-unity slope was due to biases in estimating masses using the FWHM of a fit of one or two Gaussians to quasar MgII emission lines. We provide evidence that using the line dispersion of the MgII line produces less biased black hole mass estimates.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Biases in the Quasar Mass-Luminosity Plane does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Biases in the Quasar Mass-Luminosity Plane, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Biases in the Quasar Mass-Luminosity Plane will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-453046