Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Dec 2008
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2008agufmin31d..01j&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2008, abstract #IN31D-01
Mathematics
Logic
0525 Data Management
Scientific paper
In February 2006 a deceptively simple concept was put forward. Could we use the International Year of Planet Earth 2008 as a stimulus to begin the creation of a digital geological map of the planet at a target scale of 1:1 million? Could we design and initiate a project that uniquely mobilises geological surveys around the world to act as the drivers and sustainable data providers of this global dataset? Further, could we synergistically use this geoscientist-friendly vehicle of creating a tangible geological map to accelerate progress of an emerging global geoscience data model and interchange standard? Finally, could we use the project to transfer know-how to developing countries and reduce the length and expense of their learning curve, while at the same time producing geoscience maps and data that could attract interest and investment? These aspirations, plus the chance to generate a global digital geological dataset to assist in the understanding of global environmental problems and the opportunity to raise the profile of geoscience as part of IYPE seemed more than enough reasons to take the proposal to the next stage. In March 2007, in Brighton, UK, 81 delegates from 43 countries gathered together to consider the creation of this global interoperable geological map dataset. The participants unanimously agreed the Brighton "Accord" and kicked off "OneGeology", an initiative that now has the support of more than 85 nations. Brighton was never designed to be a scientific or technical meeting: it was overtly about people and their interaction - would these delegates, with their diverse cultural and technical backgrounds, be prepared to work together to achieve something which, while technically challenging, was not complex in the context of leading edge geoscience informatics. Could we scale up what is a simple informatics model at national level, to deliver global coverage and access? The major challenges for OneGeology (and the deployment of interoperability) are rarely scientific or technical; they were and are the significantly more difficult logistical and "geopolitical - cultural" issues. OneGeology has grown and progressed rapidly to be an international project. It has not only achieved its first phase scientific and technical goals in launching its web map portal with map data from 30 nations at the International Geological Congress in August 2008, but has also attracted substantial scientific, public and media interest around the world. OneGeology is, in every sense, a child of its time - an agile Internet paradigm - a project whose informatics interoperability goals are in reality the total project ethos. The project has been allowed to grow and extend just as fast and as wide as its actors agree to take it, for the most part free from the territoriality and bureaucracy that all too often inhibit such initiatives. It is beyond doubt that a conventionally run (and thus constrained) OneGeology would not have achieved its goals. The OneGeology team has taken enormous strides in a very short space of time and the achievements are considerable. But some new challenges now arise. How will we sustain the project? Where do we take it next? Can OneGeology continue its "liberal" modus operandi? How should we fund and provide continuity for a growing and thus more demanding infrastructure and user base. Should we expand the portal to include map data from academia, commerce and the public (and how to maintain authentication if one does that?) How fast do we increase the sophistication of the informatics and the resolution and diversity of the data? The presentation will describe OneGeology, its current status and the technical and cultural issues involved in trying to move forward interoperability on a global scale.
No associations
LandOfFree
Before you make the data interoperable you have to make the people interoperable does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Before you make the data interoperable you have to make the people interoperable, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Before you make the data interoperable you have to make the people interoperable will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1242373