Bayesian evidence as a tool for comparing datasets

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, accepted by Phys. Rev. D

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevD.73.067302

We introduce a new conservative test for quantifying the consistency of two or more datasets. The test is based on the Bayesian answer to the question, ``How much more probable is it that all my data were generated from the same model system than if each dataset were generated from an independent set of model parameters?''. We make explicit the connection between evidence ratios and the differences in peak chi-squared values, the latter of which are more widely used and more cheaply calculated. Calculating evidence ratios for three cosmological datasets (recent CMB data (WMAP, ACBAR, CBI, VSA), SDSS and the most recent SNe Type 1A data) we find that concordance is favoured and the tightening of constraints on cosmological parameters is indeed justified.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Bayesian evidence as a tool for comparing datasets does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Bayesian evidence as a tool for comparing datasets, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Bayesian evidence as a tool for comparing datasets will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-120597

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.