Biology – Quantitative Biology – Populations and Evolution
Scientific paper
2009-11-03
Biology
Quantitative Biology
Populations and Evolution
31 pages, 4 figures, and 3 tables
Scientific paper
Tree reconstruction methods are often judged by their accuracy, measured by how close they get to the true tree. Yet most reconstruction methods like ML do not explicitly maximize this accuracy. To address this problem, we propose a Bayesian solution. Given tree samples, we propose finding the tree estimate which is closest on average to the samples. This ``median'' tree is known as the Bayes estimator (BE). The BE literally maximizes posterior expected accuracy, measured in terms of closeness (distance) to the true tree. We discuss a unified framework of BE trees, focusing especially on tree distances which are expressible as squared euclidean distances. Notable examples include Robinson--Foulds distance, quartet distance, and squared path difference. Using simulated data, we show Bayes estimators can be efficiently computed in practice by hill climbing. We also show that Bayes estimators achieve higher accuracy, compared to maximum likelihood and neighbor joining.
Friedrich Thomas
Haws David
Huggins Peter
Li Wenbin
Liu Jinze
No associations
LandOfFree
Bayes estimators for phylogenetic reconstruction does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Bayes estimators for phylogenetic reconstruction, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Bayes estimators for phylogenetic reconstruction will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-257001