Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1994-05-03
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
accepted by Ap.J., 24 pages, LaTeX with AAS macros, request 4 figures from dband@ucsd.edu
Scientific paper
10.1086/174759
We describe a Bayesian methodology to evaluate the consistency between the reported Ginga and BATSE detections of absorption features in gamma ray burst spectra. Currently no features have been detected by BATSE, but this methodology will still be applicable if and when such features are discovered. The Bayesian methodology permits the comparison of hypotheses regarding the two detectors' observations, and makes explicit the subjective aspects of our analysis (e.g., the quantification of our confidence in detector performance). We also present non-Bayesian consistency statistics. Based on preliminary calculations of line detectability we find that both the Bayesian and non-Bayesian techniques show that the BATSE and Ginga observations are consistent given our understanding of these detectors.
Band David L.
Briggs Matthew
Ford Lewis A.
Matteson James L.
Paciesas William
No associations
LandOfFree
BATSE Gamma-Ray Burst Line Search: II. Bayesian Consistency Methodology does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with BATSE Gamma-Ray Burst Line Search: II. Bayesian Consistency Methodology, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and BATSE Gamma-Ray Burst Line Search: II. Bayesian Consistency Methodology will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-388850