Other
Scientific paper
May 1994
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1994metic..29..334n&link_type=abstract
Meteoritics, vol. 29, no. 3, p. 334-348
Other
33
Apollo 12 Flight, Basalt, Chemical Analysis, Classifications, Crystallization, Fractionation, Lunar Geology, Lunar Rocks, Lunar Surface, Moon, Olivine, Petrography, Feldspars, Heterogeneity, Mineralogy, Photomicrographs, Tables (Data), Trace Elements
Scientific paper
New data are reported from five previously unanalyzed Apollo 12 mare basalts that are incorporated into an evaluation of previous petrogenetic models and classification schemes for these basalts. This paper proposes a classification for Apollo 12 mare basalts on the basis of whole-rock Mg# (molar 100*(Mg/(Mg+Fe))) and Rb/Sr ratio (analyzed by isotope dilution), whereby the ilmenite, olivine, and pigeonite basalt groups are readily distinguished from each other. Scrutiny of the Apollo 12 feldspathic 'suite' demonstrates that two of the three basalts previously assigned to this group (12031, 12038, 12072) can be reclassified: 12031 is a plagioclase-rich pigeonite basalt; and 12072 is an olivine basalt. Only basalt 12038 stands out as a unique sample to the Apollo 12 site, but whether this represents a single sample from another flow at the Apollo 12 site or is exotic to this site is equivocal. The question of whether the olivine and pigeonite basalt suites are co-magmatic is addressed by incompatible trace-element chemistry: the trends defined by these two suites when Co/Sm and Sm/Eu ratios are plotted against Rb/Sr ratio demonstrate that these two basaltic types cannot be co-magmatic. Crystal fractionation/accumulation paths have been calculated and show that neither the pigeonite, olivine, or ilmenite basalts are related by this process. Each suite requires a distinct and separate source region. This study also examines sample heterogeneity and the degree to which whole-rock analyses are representative, which is critical when petrogenetic interpretation is undertaken. Sample heterogeneity has been investigated petrographically (inhomogeneous mineral distribution) with consideration of duplicate analyses, and whether a specific sample (using average data) plots consistently upon a fractionation trend when a number of different compostional parameters are considered. Using these criteria, four basalts have been identified where reported analyses are not representative of the whole-rock composition: 12005, an ilmenite basalt; 12006 and 12036, olivine basalts; and 12031 previously classified as a feldspathic basalt, but reclassified as part of the pigeonite suite.
Hacker Matthew D.
Liu Yun-Gang
Neal Clive R.
Schmitt Roman A.
Snyder Gregory A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Basalt generation at the Apollo 12 site. Part 1: New data, classification, and re-evaluation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Basalt generation at the Apollo 12 site. Part 1: New data, classification, and re-evaluation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Basalt generation at the Apollo 12 site. Part 1: New data, classification, and re-evaluation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-887774