Computer Science – Logic in Computer Science
Scientific paper
2002-07-25
Computer Science
Logic in Computer Science
16 pages. Originally published in proc. PCL 2002, a FLoC workshop; eds. Hendrik Decker, Dina Goldin, Jorgen Villadsen, Toshiha
Scientific paper
This paper studies axioms for nonmonotonic consequences from a semantics-based point of view, focusing on a class of mathematical structures for reasoning about partial information without a predefined syntax/logic. This structure is called a default structure. We study axioms for the nonmonotonic consequence relation derived from extensions as in Reiter's default logic, using skeptical reasoning, but extensions are now used for the construction of possible worlds in a default information structure. In previous work we showed that skeptical reasoning arising from default-extensions obeys a well-behaved set of axioms including the axiom of cautious cut. We show here that, remarkably, the converse is also true: any consequence relation obeying this set of axioms can be represented as one constructed from skeptical reasoning. We provide representation theorems to relate axioms for nonmonotonic consequence relation and properties about extensions, and provide one-to-one correspondence between nonmonotonic systems which satisfies the law of cautious monotony and default structures with unique extensions. Our results give a theoretical justification for a set of basic rules governing the update of nonmonotonic knowledge bases, demonstrating the derivation of them from the more concrete and primitive construction of extensions. It is also striking to note that proofs of the representation theorems show that only shallow extensions are necessary, in the sense that the number of iterations needed to achieve an extension is at most three. All of these developments are made possible by taking a more liberal view of consistency: consistency is a user defined predicate, satisfying some basic properties.
No associations
LandOfFree
Axiomatic Aspects of Default Inference does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Axiomatic Aspects of Default Inference, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Axiomatic Aspects of Default Inference will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-226628