Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature: a citation analysis

Computer Science – Digital Libraries

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

citation changes; final manuscript

Scientific paper

10.1002/asi.20965

In this article, we analyze the citations to articles published in 11 biological and medical journals from 2003 to 2007 that employ author-choice open access models. Controlling for known explanatory predictors of citations, only 2 of the 11 journals show positive and significant open access effects. Analyzing all journals together, we report a small but significant increase in article citations of 17%. In addition, there is strong evidence to suggest that the open access advantage is declining by about 7% per year, from 32% in 2004 to 11% in 2007.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature: a citation analysis does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature: a citation analysis, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature: a citation analysis will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-698660

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.