Augmenting Tractable Fragments of Abstract Argumentation

Computer Science – Artificial Intelligence

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

accepted for ijcai 2011

Scientific paper

We present a new and compelling approach to the efficient solution of important computational problems that arise in the context of abstract argumentation. Our approach makes known algorithms defined for restricted fragments generally applicable, at a computational cost that scales with the distance from the fragment. Thus, in a certain sense, we gradually augment tractable fragments. Surprisingly, it turns out that some tractable fragments admit such an augmentation and that others do not. More specifically, we show that the problems of credulous and skeptical acceptance are fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the distance from the fragment of acyclic argumentation frameworks. Other tractable fragments such as the fragments of symmetrical and bipartite frameworks seem to prohibit an augmentation: the acceptance problems are already intractable for frameworks at distance 1 from the fragments. For our study we use a broad setting and consider several different semantics. For the algorithmic results we utilize recent advances in fixed-parameter tractability.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Augmenting Tractable Fragments of Abstract Argumentation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Augmenting Tractable Fragments of Abstract Argumentation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Augmenting Tractable Fragments of Abstract Argumentation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-167358

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.