Asteroid Shapes and the Angle of Repose

Details Asteroid Shapes and the Angle of Repose Asteroid Shapes and the Angle of Repose

May 1999

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1999aas...194.1506h&link_type=abstract

American Astronomical Society, 194th AAS Meeting, #15.06; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 31, p.848

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astronomy

2

Scientific paper

There is a growing view among planetary scientists that many if not most of the small bodies of the solar system (including asteroids and comets) are ``rubble piles'' held together by self-gravity rather than material strength. In several cases, though, the assumption that asteroid rubble piles should conform to figures of hydrostatic equilibrium leads to unrealistically high inferred densities for those objects. I suggest here that rubble piles should instead be explicitly considered as granular materials, which behave very differently from fluids even on large scales (as anyone who has walked among sand dunes can testify). I demonstrate that even completely cohesionless particulate assemblies can maintain shapes that are significantly different from figures of hydrostatic equilibrium, so long as: 1) the difference between the local surface normal and the local acceleration vector does not exceed the angle of repose; and 2) internal stresses do not crush individual particles.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Asteroid Shapes and the Angle of Repose does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Asteroid Shapes and the Angle of Repose, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Asteroid Shapes and the Angle of Repose will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1119929