Are $^{12}$CO lines good indicators of the star formation rate in galaxies?

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

10 pages, 3 figures and 4 tables, Accepted in MNRAS

Scientific paper

In this paper, we investigate the relevance of using the $^{12}$CO line emissions as indicators of star formation rates (SFR). For the first time, we present this study for a relatively large number of $^{12}$CO transitions (12) as well as over a large interval in redshift (from z$\sim$0 to z$\sim$6). For the nearby sources (D$\leq$10 Mpc), we have used homogeneous sample of $^{12}$CO data provided by Bayet et al. (2004, 2006), mixing observational and modelled line intensities. For higher-z sources (z $\geq$ 1), we have collected $^{12}$CO observations from various papers and have completed the data set of line intensities with model predictions which we also present in this paper. Finally, for increasing the statistics, we have included recent $^{12}$CO(1-0) and $^{12}$CO(3-2) observations of intermediate-z sources. Linear regressions have been calculated for identifying the tightest SFR-$^{12}$CO line luminosity relationships. We show that the \emph{total} $^{12}$CO, the $^{12}$CO(5-4), the $^{12}$CO(6-5) and the $^{12}$CO(7-6) luminosities are the best indicators of SFR (as measured by the far-infrared luminosity). Comparisons with theoretical approaches from Krumholz and Thompson (2007) and Narayanan et al. (2008) are also performed in this paper. Although in general agreement, the predictions made by these authors and the observational results we present here show small and interesting discrepancies. In particular, the slope of the linear regressions, for J$_{upper}\geq$ 4 $^{12}$CO lines are not similar between theoretical studies and observations. On one hand, a larger high-J $^{12}$CO data set of observations might help to better agree with models, increasing the statistics. On the other hand, theoretical studies extended to high redshift sources might also reduce such discrepancies.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Are $^{12}$CO lines good indicators of the star formation rate in galaxies? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Are $^{12}$CO lines good indicators of the star formation rate in galaxies?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Are $^{12}$CO lines good indicators of the star formation rate in galaxies? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-475981

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.